Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-35284508-20181120174212/@comment-35284508-20190226174515

Jp356 wrote: Due to your background in CS, I trust that you are well versed in the inner workings of a True-RNG and the various classes of Pseudo -RNGs (and their neat applications). So you got a pretty Gaussian curve from your data. 😁

Again, it doesn't matter if MT invested in a nuclear decay randomizer, uses 50 blind monks in a room rolling dice or used an off the shelf pseudo RNG seeded with mother's maiden name. If it cant be predicted it is random. One difference being if you know the pseudo routine and the seed you can predict exactly what the result will be- but I dont think that is your claim.